Barberton Post Acute
Barberton, Ohio · CCN 365340
19 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 76
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Summit
- Medicare-certified since
- 1979
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Apr 28, 2025
560 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.44 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.46 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 49.3% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1263.2% | E421.1% | F15.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Barberton Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 27, 2026
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facilityfailed to provide supervision during a meal for Resident #81. This resulted in ImmediateJeopardy when Resident #81 was provided a meal tray and consumed food items without staffsupervision resulting in the resident being found unresponsive with blue fingers, food in hermouth, and deceased . This affected one (Resident #81) of three residents (#4, #23, and #81)reviewed for meal assistance. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF695Mar 10, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26's received adequate respiratory care to comprehensively address and prevent respiratory distress resulting in hospitalization . Actual harm occurred on 02/07/23 when Resident #26 was transferred and then admitted to the intensive care unit for uncompensated respiratory acidosis requiring non-invasive ventilation. Between 02/05/23 and 02/07/23 the resident had shortness of breath, non-productive cough, audible wheezing, loss of appetite and complaints of not feeling well which were not adequately or timely addressed/treated resulting in the resident's continued deterioration in health and subsequent hospitalization . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 15, 2025
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure its kitchen area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 70 out of 72 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Two residents (Resident's #3 and #21) out of 72 residents received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 72. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 01/13/25 from 8:07 A.M. through 8:27 A.M. revealed: A kitchen door with dry food splatter. In the dry storeroom, open bags of spiral noodles and egg noodles with no open date. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF730Jan 15, 2025
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed as required for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). This affected three of three CNA's personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file on 01/14/25 with Human Resource Director (HR) #815 revealed CNA #826 had a hire date of 08/20/20. Review of the employee's personnel file revealed no annual performance evaluation had been completed for 2024. 2. Review of the personnel file on 01/14/25 with Human Resource Director (HR) #815 revealed CNA #863 had a hire date of 05/23/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jan 15, 2025
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration. This affected three residents #29, #47, and #18 out of six (Residents #4, #7, #18, #29, #47, and #54) reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1 Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, Hodgkin lymphoma, thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 76 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 28, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 15, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Mar 10, 2023Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Nov 7, 2019Standard2 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 20, 2017Standard8 findings
- Jul 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 13, 2016Standard7 findings
- Feb 25, 2015Standard4 findings
- Nov 21, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 23, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 17, 2012—13 findings
- Sep 28, 2011—2 findings
- Jul 14, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction