Deficiency Index

Bakersfield Post Acute

Bakersfield, California · CCN 555260

120 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
331
Surveys
120
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file88/120

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Kern
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

May 14, 2026

179 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.014.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover38.6%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$25,940 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG21.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6254.9%E4438.9%F54.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 113 of the 331 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5588×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6588×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F7257×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

  • F6566×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8425×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bakersfield Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 79) when staff did not evaluate, report and document potential changes in the skin. This failure resulted in Resident 79 developing a facility acquired right heel injury which progressed to a pressure ulcer (open sore caused by poor blood flow or pressure) causing pain to Resident 79. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Oct 26, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive plan of care (helps nurses and other care team members organize aspects of resident care according to a timeline) to address risk for falls for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall with fracture (break in the bone) to the anterior (near the front of the body or nearer to the head) column of the left acetabulum (the socket portion of the ball-and-socket hip joint) with extension of the fracture into the left superior (higher in position) and left inferior (lower in position) pubic rami (pubic rami are a group of bones that make up part of the pelvis (basin-shaped complex of bones that connects the trunk [central part of… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 23, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an air mattress was appropriately deflated prior to provision of care for Resident 1. 2. Ensure one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1) was competent to perform a task prior to providing that task for Resident 1. These failures resulted in Resident 1 falling off her bed onto the floor and sustaining a right arm skin tear, laceration to the scalp and a collarbone fracture, which required the resident to be transferred to the acute care hospital. Findings: During an interview on 11/17/21, at 12:15 PM, with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated, she was providing care to Resident 1 when she fell on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. The treatment nurse had long artificial nails. 2. One of one linen cart cover was a mesh (uniform small openings) material, and the mesh cover was frayed in the center. 3. Two of two housekeeping carts trash bins did not have lids. 4. Three of four sample resident rooms (Resident 36, Resident 14 and Resident 133) who were on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-infection control strategy that uses PPE to reduce the spread infections) had no Personal Protective Equipment supplies (PPE-equipment worn to minimize exposure to a variety of hazards). These failures had the potential to spread infections to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Aug 24, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was answered timely for two of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs, and negatively impact safety, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident 2 and Resident 3. Findings: During an interview on 7/24/23, 1:52 p.m. Resident 2, Resident 2 stated she waited three hours on Saturday for her call light to be answered. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 6/15/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status with a range of 0-15) score was 15 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). During an interview on 7/24/23, 2:08 p.m. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 331 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 14, 2026Standard and complaint22 findings
  • Mar 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 112 earlier surveys
  • Apr 22, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2024Standard17 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • May 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 29, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 26, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • May 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2023Standard21 findings
  • Jan 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Oct 29, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Nov 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Sep 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Jan 26, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 24, 2015Standard14 findings
  • Dec 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 7, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Jan 7, 2014—1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2014—1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2013Standard17 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 17, 2013—1 finding
  • May 17, 2013—1 finding
  • May 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2012—11 findings
  • Sep 21, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 4, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2012—2 findings
  • Apr 11, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2012—8 findings
  • Dec 22, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 14, 2011—12 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 4, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction