Azria Health Olathe
Olathe, Kansas · CCN 175557
19 surveys since 2015, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 125
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AZRIA HEALTH
- County
- Johnson
- Medicare-certified since
- 2015
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 15 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Sep 10, 2025
425 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.12 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.4% | 50.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $54,031 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.2% | K12.2% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3475.6% | E613.3% | F36.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7443×
Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5822×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Azria Health Olathe, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF744May 12, 2022
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents; five residents were reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Eighteen residents resided on the memory care unit. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 248 when the facility failed to identify and implement resident-centered interventions to address violent/aggressive behaviors, wandering, and negative resident-to-resident altercations which included physical aggression. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 10, 2025
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with three reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from sexual abuse when cognitively impaired Resident (R) 16, a resident with a history of inappropriate touching, touched R75's genital area against R75's wishes. On 07/18/25, R16 touched a lady in a sexual way, and the facility sent R16 to the hospital for inappropriate behavior. R16 returned to the facility on [DATE], but the facility did not implement interventions to address R16's inappropriate touching. On 08/28/25, R16 exhibited sexual behaviors towards staff, but the facility did not address these behaviors with new interventions. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 12, 2021
The facility reported a census of 113 residents. The sample included three residents at risk for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 received adequate care and supervision to prevent a fall. On 10/07/21 at approximately 11:00 AM, while being supervised and assisted by a facility staff member, R1 fell from a wheelchair onto the pavement in a parking lot, at an offsite location (drug store) when the facility staff member diverted her attention from R1's safety to her cell phone. R1 sustained skin tears, abrasions, and a laceration (cut) which required evaluation and treatment which included sutures (stitches) at a local hospital before returning to the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF755Sep 10, 2025
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with five medication carts and three medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs at the end of daily work shifts and maintain the staff count sheets for the controlled drugs. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included:- On 09/09/25 at 07:30 AM, a review of the September 2025 Narcotic Shift Count Sheet on the 200 hall from 09/01/25 to 09/09/25 (nine days) revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse or the off-going nurse on the following dates: 09/01/25, 09/02/25, 09/03/25, 09/04/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2025
The facility identified a census of 107 residents, with one kitchen and two dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to storage, preparation, and meal service. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 09/08/25 at 07:05 AM, a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the main kitchen area revealed:The floor was heavily dirty with old food debris and trash in the food prep and stove area. A soiled towel was on the floor next to the stove top ovens. Dessert saucers and plates were stored upwards in the dishware storage rack. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 10, 2025Standard17 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 23, 2024Standard13 findings
- Aug 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 12, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 12, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 15, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2021Standard1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 23, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jun 18, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
- Apr 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2017Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 7, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 2, 2016Complaint13 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 1, 2016Standard4 findings
- Sep 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction