Avon Nursing Home L L C
Avon, New York · CCN 335216
15 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 79
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- HURLBUT CARE
- County
- Livingston
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Oct 2, 2024
768 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.40 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.9% | 48.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $32,975 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G116.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B116.7% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avon Nursing Home L L C, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Mar 29, 2023
Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00313057) the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Specifically, the facility did not know at what operating temperatures the in-room heating system should function, had no system or policy in place to monitor operating temperatures or the distance of residents from the in-room heating units required to prevent injury. Subsequently, Resident #1 sustained multiple second-degree thermal injuries on bilateral legs, right shoulder, and right hand from falling out of bed and onto the baseboard heater in their room. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Oct 2, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/26/2024 to 10/02/2024, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #27 had multiple meal refusals and decreased intakes (less than 50%) for approximately two months resulting in a 31 pound (14.4%) unplanned, severe weight loss. The facility could not provide evidence that nursing leadership, dietary or the medical team had been notified or any supplemental interventions had been implemented. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Oct 2, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/26/2024 to 10/02/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were assessed by an interdisciplinary team to determine their ability to safely self-administer a medication for one (Resident #7) of six residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 was observed with a prescribed inhaler kept at the beside with no documented evidence that an assessment had been completed to determine their ability to safely self-administer the medication or a physician's order for self-administration. This was evidenced by the following: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications, dated April 2019, revealed that medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Oct 2, 2024
Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/26/2024 to 10/02/2024, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care (including measurable goals and interventions) for one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for communication and sensory. Specifically, Resident #14's Comprehensive Care Plan did not include that the resident had profound hearing loss, used of an amplifier (hearing aid), or was able to read lips. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Sep 30, 2021
Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 9/30/21, it was determined for 1 (Resident #7) of 14 residents, the facility did not ensure that staff who have the skills and qualifications to assess relevant care areas and who are knowledgeable about the resident's status, needs, strengths and areas of decline, accurately complete the resident assessment. Specifically, Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, dated 5/7/21 and 7/6/21, were incorrectly coded or did not include the resident's Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) conditions. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 79 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 2, 2024Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 29, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 17, 2023Standard and complaint1 finding
- Sep 30, 2021Standard2 findings
- Apr 24, 2019Standard10 findings
- Dec 1, 2017Standard8 findings
- Sep 8, 2016Standard6 findings
- Nov 10, 2015Standard10 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Apr 24, 2015Standard3 findings
- Aug 28, 2014Standard4 findings
- Dec 5, 2013—5 findings
- Sep 6, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 7, 2013—8 findings
- Feb 9, 2012—9 findings
- Jan 10, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Eddy Village Green at BeverwyckSlingerlands1 harm finding
- The Brightonian, IncRochester1 harm finding
- Dunkirk Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterDunkirk2 harm findings
- Oak Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Care CenterIthacano harm findings
- The Brook at High Falls Nursing Home and RehabilitRochesterno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction