Deficiency Index

Aviva at Fitzsimons

Aurora, Colorado · CCN 065430

10 surveys since 2019. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
35
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2019–2026
’19’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file3/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
VIVAGE SENIOR LIVING
County
Adams
Medicare-certified since
2018

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 48 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Colorado.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.923.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.51—
Annual nurse turnover61.4%44.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$7,008 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG28.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1248.0%E832.0%F312.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 35 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5852×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aviva at Fitzsimons, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 26, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of 10 sample residents remained free from accidents.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of history of falling, a fracture of the left ilium (upper part of the pelvis), atrial fibrillation (AFIB), hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia. Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairments and required maximum assistance from staff. On 8/13/25 at approximately 4:30 p.m. Resident #1 was seated at the nurses' station where he sustained an unwitnessed fall. Resident #1 was assessed by a registered nurse (RN) and was assessed to have no injuries. After the fall, the staff assisted Resident #1 in his wheelchair back to the nurses' station. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jul 31, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (#52) of three residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized for worsening congestive heart failure. The resident had a history of chronic congestive heart failure and resistance to oral antibiotics. During the hospital stay just prior to the resident's admission the resident was treated for severe edema/ water retention as evidenced by a rapid significant weight gain and swelling in both lower extremities and muscle weakness and fatigue. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 6, 2023

    Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#6, #2 and #9) of three residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents out of 16 sample residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6, who had a history of falls and was assessed to be a high fall risk upon admission, received the care and services indicated in her comprehensive plan of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was answered timely, which was an intervention on her care plan, to prevent the resident from getting up without assistance. On 1/30/23, Resident #6 reported she pushed her call light and waited for 30 minutes to be assisted to the bathroom. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Oct 8, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure mandatory submission of direct care staffing based on payroll data. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staffing data entered in the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system was accurate. Findings include: I. Record review The PBJ staffing report for quarter three (4/1/24 to 6/30/24) showed the following triggered areas: -Excessive low weekend staffing; and, -One star rating. The trigger for low weekend staffing triggered the facility's one star rating. -However, review of the facility's April 2024 to June 2024 staff time cards revealed the facility did not have low weekend staffing. II. Staff interview The nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 10/7/24 at 2:45 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Jul 31, 2023

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to keep confidential resident-identifiable personal information and medical treatments for 27 of 27 residents; and to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented medical status and response to nursing/medical care and treatment in keeping with accepted standards of practice for a sample of two of four residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Keep confidential information specifically protected health information (PHI) out of view of other residents and visitors for 27 of 27 residents on the unit; and, -Ensure Resident #47's medical record contained accurate and complete documentation regarding the resident's restorative management plan; restorative services provided; and the resident's… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 35 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 6, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2020Complaint5 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Dec 10, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jul 2, 2019Complaint1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction