Aviva at Fitzsimons
Aurora, Colorado · CCN 065430
10 surveys since 2019. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 35
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- VIVAGE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Adams
- Medicare-certified since
- 2018
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 48 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Jul 8, 2026
124 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.92 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 61.4% | 44.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $7,008 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G28.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1248.0% | E832.0% | F312.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5852×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aviva at Fitzsimons, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 26, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of 10 sample residents remained free from accidents.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of history of falling, a fracture of the left ilium (upper part of the pelvis), atrial fibrillation (AFIB), hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia. Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairments and required maximum assistance from staff. On 8/13/25 at approximately 4:30 p.m. Resident #1 was seated at the nurses' station where he sustained an unwitnessed fall. Resident #1 was assessed by a registered nurse (RN) and was assessed to have no injuries. After the fall, the staff assisted Resident #1 in his wheelchair back to the nurses' station. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jul 31, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (#52) of three residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized for worsening congestive heart failure. The resident had a history of chronic congestive heart failure and resistance to oral antibiotics. During the hospital stay just prior to the resident's admission the resident was treated for severe edema/ water retention as evidenced by a rapid significant weight gain and swelling in both lower extremities and muscle weakness and fatigue. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 6, 2023
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#6, #2 and #9) of three residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents out of 16 sample residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6, who had a history of falls and was assessed to be a high fall risk upon admission, received the care and services indicated in her comprehensive plan of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was answered timely, which was an intervention on her care plan, to prevent the resident from getting up without assistance. On 1/30/23, Resident #6 reported she pushed her call light and waited for 30 minutes to be assisted to the bathroom. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Oct 8, 2024
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure mandatory submission of direct care staffing based on payroll data. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staffing data entered in the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system was accurate. Findings include: I. Record review The PBJ staffing report for quarter three (4/1/24 to 6/30/24) showed the following triggered areas: -Excessive low weekend staffing; and, -One star rating. The trigger for low weekend staffing triggered the facility's one star rating. -However, review of the facility's April 2024 to June 2024 staff time cards revealed the facility did not have low weekend staffing. II. Staff interview The nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 10/7/24 at 2:45 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Jul 31, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to keep confidential resident-identifiable personal information and medical treatments for 27 of 27 residents; and to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented medical status and response to nursing/medical care and treatment in keeping with accepted standards of practice for a sample of two of four residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Keep confidential information specifically protected health information (PHI) out of view of other residents and visitors for 27 of 27 residents on the unit; and, -Ensure Resident #47's medical record contained accurate and complete documentation regarding the resident's restorative management plan; restorative services provided; and the resident's… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 35 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 8, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 6, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 2, 2020Complaint5 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Dec 10, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Fountain View Rehabilitation and Nursing LLCColorado Springs2 harm findings
- Vista Grande Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterCortez2 harm findings
- Highland Park Rehabilitation & Care CenterAurora1 harm finding
- Life Care Center of LittletonLittleton2 harm findings
- Riverbend Health and Rehabilitation CenterLoveland2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction