Avir at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas · CCN 455713
44 surveys since 2010, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 242
- Surveys
- 44
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 119
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVIR HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Bexar
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
May 8, 2026
185 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.63 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.07 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 60.7% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $29,494 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.3% | K12.3% | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2455.8% | E1330.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.3% | C24.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6413×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avir at San Antonio, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Aug 30, 2025
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #9 and #63) reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. Resident #9 was observed with her own smoking paraphernalia which included a lighter (a self-contained ignition source used to lite cigarettes) and was observed smoking on the facility property without supervision and or at the assigned agreed upon times for supervised smoking. 2. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF805Jul 26, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure provided food was prepared in the proper form to meet residents needs for 1 of 6 residents reviewed, (Resident #1), reviewed for food form. On 7/21/24 the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was given the correct physician-ordered diet texture of a meal which led to choking. An IJ was identified on 07/22/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:07 pm. While the IJ was removed on 07/26/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF584Sep 20, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1's room) of 12 resident rooms reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to ensure there were no pests in Resident #1's room on 9/5/25.This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm due to diminished quality of life and/or physical harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 9/20/25, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Muscle Weakness, Polyneuropathies (disorder affecting multiple peripheral nerves, causing damage/dysfunction), and history of other diseases of the nervous… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 and Resident #5.The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #3, and #4 had a completed comprehensive care plan. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Aug 30, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from chemical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #60) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 received a gradual dose reduction for anti-psychotic medication, Zyprexa. This deficient practice could affect any resident receiving medications and could result in adverse effects and ultimately a decline in physical condition.The findings were:Review of Resident #60's face sheet dated 8/30/35 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Major… […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 242 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 8, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Dec 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 30, 2025Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- May 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2024Standard13 findings · 1 harm
Show the 36 earlier surveys
- Jun 2, 2023Standard1 finding
- Apr 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 31, 2022Standard7 findings
- Feb 4, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jan 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 6, 2020Standard7 findings
- Sep 18, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 13, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2019Standard13 findings
- May 11, 2018Standard13 findings
- Dec 11, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Sep 18, 2017Complaint5 findings · 4 harm
- Jul 20, 2017Complaint5 findings
- May 26, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Apr 20, 2017Standard15 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Complaint12 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 1, 2016Standard6 findings
- Dec 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 25, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Mar 9, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 20, 2013—22 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 12, 2013—2 findings
- May 24, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 14, 2012—22 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 10, 2012—2 findings
- Oct 13, 2011—14 findings
- Jul 26, 2011—1 finding
- Feb 17, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 15, 2010—8 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 15, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction