Avir at Kerrville
Kerrville, Texas · CCN 745050
19 surveys since 2024, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 85
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 130
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVIR HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Kerr · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2024
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 1, 2026
131 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.37 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.4% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $20,467 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J23.0% | K11.5% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H11.5% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3552.2% | E2334.3% | F23.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.5% | C23.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6416×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F8426×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F7615×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Kerrville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF656Jul 1, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 residents (Resident #1, #3, #4) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. Facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan that addressed Resident #1's risk for fall to with interventions to prevent further injury when he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a broken neck from a fall at home and when he had a fall at the facility on 6/05/2024 (date of admission), 6/09/2024, two falls on 6/12/2024 and a fall on… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Apr 6, 2025
Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 4 (#1) residents in that: Resident #1 was administered CPR, 2 compressions which caused Resident #1 to moan in pain, by LVN A after found unresponsive. Resident #1 was a DNR. Resident #1 had an OOH-DNR. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 1:26 PM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 1, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that; The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was supervised while ambulating and had interventions in place to prevent falls. Resident #1 who was admitted with a significant history of falls, had 5 documented falls at the facility from admission to discharge, 6/05/2024 date of admission, 6/09/2024, 6/12/2024 x 2 and 6/24/2024 when he fell during the night and suffered a subdural hematoma (a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering) and required a hospital stay in ICU. […]
- Actual harm, patternF760Dec 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for drug administration in that:Resident #1 was administered one tablet of Donepezil HCL Oral Tablet 10 MG (Donepezil Hydrochloride) twice a day from 11/14/2025 to 11/26/2025. The physician order was 1 tablet of Donepezil HCL Oral Tablet 10 MG (Donepezil Hydrochloride) once a day.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF640May 8, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to, within 14 days after a facility completes a resident's assessment, electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System, including the admission assessment for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #101, #102, and #103) reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility failed to transmit the MDS withing 14 days of assessment for Resident's #101, #102, and #103. These failures placed residents at risk by not providing resident specific information for payment and quality measure purposes. The findings included: 1. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 85 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 28, 2026Standard12 findings
- Aug 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 24, 2026Complaint7 findings
- Mar 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Jan 14, 2026Complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Dec 12, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 21, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jun 27, 2025Standard12 findings
- Jun 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Apr 6, 2025Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2024Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
- May 8, 2024Standard10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction