Deficiency Index

Avir at Jefferson

Jefferson, Texas · CCN 675241

25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
120
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
116
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AVIR HEALTH GROUP
County
Marion · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Feb 22, 2026

260 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.293.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover58.8%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,498 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2863.6%E1125.0%F36.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 44 of the 120 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6553×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6953×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Jefferson, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 23, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, pain management services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident #1) Resident #1 complained of pain in her heel prior to wound care. She complained of pain during the wound care treatment and at no time was the wound care held or pain medications offered. Review of Resident #1's physician orders indicated she did not have any PRN pain medications ordered. This failure caused the resident to experience pain during wound care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/23/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility has failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair brakes were functioning correctly to prevent a fall in her bathroom which resulted in a fracture. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accidents and hazards. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/19/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on 12/01/22. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 2, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident needs for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for competent nursing staff. (Resident #1) LVN A did not report Resident #1's skin tear to the resident's family, hospice company, physician, or other facility staff members. The resident's skin tear was found two days later by facility staff. Her arm was warm, red, and swollen, required wound care and an antibiotic. These failures could place all residents at risk for inadequate treatment and interventions based on inaccurate assessments of their medical needs and conditions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 3, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility did not ensure: 1. Meat was thawing in the appropriate container and sink under constant flow of cool, running water during the initial tour on 02/26/2024.2. A container which held a thick pink liquid was labeled and dated. 3. A box of frozen biscuits, a box of frozen corn, a plastic bag of cheese, and a plastic bag of chicken nuggets were sealed appropriately in the refrigerator. 4. The potato freezer was free of rust on the bottom shelf inside the freezer. 5. The juice tubing was kept off the ground. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 19, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. Dietary Manager not properly securing facial hair. 2. Particles on top of dishwasher. 3. Grease buildup on the left side of gas stove and grease [NAME]. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 8:55 AM, the dietary manager was not wearing proper facial covering upon entry into the kitchen. During an observation on 9/17/2024 at 8:19 AM, the dietary manager was not wearing facial covering. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 120 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 22, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 3, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Sep 19, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jul 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 16, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jun 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Oct 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 5, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Dec 20, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 7, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • May 10, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2016Standard9 findings
  • May 28, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Feb 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jan 30, 2013—5 findings
  • Feb 23, 2012—7 findings
  • Mar 16, 2011—6 findings
  • Sep 13, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction