Deficiency Index

Aviata at Emerald Shores

Callaway, Florida · CCN 105148

25 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
69
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
77
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AVIATA HEALTH GROUP
County
Bay
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 20, 2025

599 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.433.65
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover62.4%40.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD9100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 69 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aviata at Emerald Shores, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Mar 20, 2025

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN, CMS-10055 form) to 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The SNF ABN provides information to beneficiaries so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. (Resident #64) The findings include: Based upon facility documentation, Resident #64 was discharged from a Medicare Part A stay on 2/24/25 and remained in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Mar 20, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate fingernail care to 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident #33) The findings include: Observations of Resident #33 were conducted on 3/17/25 at 11:54 AM, 3/18/25 at 11:31 AM, and 3/19/25 at 9:05 AM. During the observations, the resident's left hand was observed to be contracted and 4 of the 5 fingernails (all nails except the thumb nail) on her left hand were long and untrimmed. Further observation of Resident #33's left hand was conducted on 3/19/25 at 10:45 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON observed the nails on the resident's left hand and confirmed the resident's left hand was contracted. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693Mar 20, 2025

    Based upon observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide proper enteral feedings for 2 of 2 residents observed for enteral feeding. (Resident #1 and #44) The findings include: On 03/17/25 at 11:52 AM, Resident #1 was lying in bed with Glucerna being administered at 55 ml/hr. However, Resident #44's name was written on the tube feeding bottle. Resident #44 was being administered Jevity 1.5 at 45ml/hr but the bottle had Resident #1's name written on the tube feeding bottle. (photographic evidence obtained) As this was observed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B came into the room. She was asked to identify Resident #1 and #44. The CNA stated Resident #44 was in the B-bed and Resident #1 was in A-bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF726Dec 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility staff failed to demonstrate competency in skin care during 1 of 1 partial bed bath observations. (Resident #4) The findings include: An observation of a partial bed bath for Resident #4 was observed being performed by Employee A, a Certified Nursing Assistant, on 12/10/24 at 8:40 AM. Employee A explained the procedure to Resident #4. Employee A then obtained one pan of water from the sink in the bathroom and donned gloves. Employee A requested that Resident #4 wash his face with the wet washcloth. Employee A then placed liquid soap in the pan of water, wet the washcloth, and then washed the resident's chest and underarms with the soapy washcloth. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Dec 21, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain restroom faucets and over bed tables in good condition in 5 of 16 sampled rooms. (Rooms 200, 203, 211, 403, and 405) The findings include: A tour of the 200 and 400 halls was conducted in the presence of the Administrator on 12/20/23 at 3:35 PM. On 12/20/23 at 3:35 PM, it was observed that the sink faucets in rooms 200, 203, 211, 403, and 405 were heavily tarnished. At this time, the Administrator acknowledged that the faucets were tarnished and housekeeping had attempted to clean them, but admitted it may have made the tarnish worse. The Administrator also observed the over bed table in room [ROOM NUMBER] B and confirmed the frame was rusted. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 69 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 20, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Dec 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jul 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Standard1 finding
  • May 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Dec 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2020Standard6 findings
  • Feb 21, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 10, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 21, 2017Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Apr 4, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jul 31, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 1, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 19, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2012—2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2012—7 findings
  • Feb 24, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction