Aviata at Coral Bay

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aviata at Coral Bay, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Actual harm, isolatedF693Dec 14, 2023

  Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services for tube feeding for 2 of 2 sampled residents for tube feeding resulting in significant weight loss (Resident #62), and failure to provide tube feeding as ordered (Resident # 287). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Enteral Feeding-Enteral Nutrition Pump effective 11/30/14, and revised 11/12/18, revealed Nurses administer enteral feeding when volume control is indicated and as ordered by physician. The facility's policy titled Weighing the Resident effective 11/30/14, and revised 10/04/21, revealed Residents will be weighed unless ordered otherwise by the physician: . Admission/re-admission x 3 days . Weekly x 4 weeks . Monthly thereafter . […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 10, 2025

  Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a dryer drum in a sanitary manner for 1 of 3 dryers observed in the laundry room, failed to provide a gown for sorting in the sorting area of the laundry room, failed to keep a broom and pan off of the floor in the laundry room; and failed to properly clean and disinfect a glucometer per facility policy. The findings included: 1. The facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection the Meter with no date, revealed to disinfect: open the towelette container and pull out 1 towelette and close the lid. Wipe the entire surface of the meter 3 times horizontally and 3 times vertically using 1 towelette to clean blood and other body fluids. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 18, 2022

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that were prepared and served in a sanitary manner and in a manner to prevent the formation of pathogens that cause foodborne illness. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour, accompanied by Staff A, Cook, Staff A stated that the Dietary Manager was on vacation and would not be at the facility during the survey and stated that she was the designated person in charge of the kitchen in the absence of the Dietary Manager. The following were noted: a. There was an accumulation of residue on the blade of the can opener. b. The unit that mounted the can opener was noted to be encrusted with food residue. c. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 16, 2021

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that included: failure to maintain effective pest control in the kitchen, failure to clean dish machine after each use, failure to maintain cold food temperatures, failure to properly clean food preparation equipment, and failure to maintain ceiling air-conditioning ventilation, to prevent food borne contamination. The sanitation issues potentially effected 106 of the facility's 112 residents (6 residents receive nutrition via gastric tube). […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Apr 10, 2025

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services in a manner to provide a safe, clean, home like environment. The findings included: 1). In the common area inside of the lobby/reception area, at the entrance to the courtyard, it was noted that there were 14 out of 16 lights that did not work and that another light was flashing off and on. 2). In the Main Dining Room on the second floor, the following were noted: A. There was an unidentified residue on the windows and the tint that was applied to the interior of the windows was peeling. B. there was an accumulation of dust in the air vent over the hand washing sink. C. […]