Aviata at Central Park

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aviata at Central Park, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF814Aug 6, 2026

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained and disposed of in a manner that prevented accumulation of waste for one of one refuse disposal areas observed. This deficient practice had the potential to create an unsanitary environment and attract insects and rodents.Findings included:During an observation on 08/03/2026 at 6:40 a.m., the dumpster area was observed to have two large commercial dumpsters positioned against a brick wall with the lids open. Loose refuse and debris were visible on the ground immediately adjacent to and behind the dumpsters, including plastic materials and other discarded items. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Oct 8, 2025

  Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans for code status were in place for three residents (#1, #2, and #3) of three residents sampled. Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, altered mental status, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, stage III chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, sepsis, pneumonia, metabolic encephalopathy, congestive heart failure (CHF), and dependence on supplemental oxygen.Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 9/8/25 showed resident was a full code. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jan 7, 2025

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) of five residents observed requiring assistance with eating, were provided a dignified dining experience. Findings included: On 1/7/25 at 12:50 p.m., an observation showed a staff member standing next to the bed of Resident #5 with utensil in hand. The staff member identified themselves as a speech therapist. On 1/7/25 at 1:02 p.m., an observation showed a covered meal tray sitting on the over-bed table of Resident #8. On 1/7/25 at 1:03 p.m., an observation revealed Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered Resident #7's room and stood between the privacy curtain and Resident #7's bed. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jan 7, 2025

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of three residents sampled for care plans. Findings included: 1. Review of the Admission Record showed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 was readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital and was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 12/31/24. The Admission Record also showed Resident #2 had diagnoses including but not limited to displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur on 12/12/24, Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, anemia, hypertension, and disorders of bone density. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Jan 7, 2025

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with profession standards of practice related to pressure wounds/ ulcers for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of three residents sampled for pressure wounds/ ulcers. Findings included: 1. Review of the Admission Record showed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 was readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital and was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 12/31/24. […]