Avantara Clark City
Clark, South Dakota · CCN 435058
15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 33
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 35
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LEGACY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Clark · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 8, 2026
305 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.17 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.4% | 43.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $11,057 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G114.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D228.6% | E457.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6091×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F7001×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F8801×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avantara Clark City, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 12, 2024
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the provider failed to ensure a bed frame was maintained and free of hazardous sharp areas for one of one sampled resident (1) who acquired a skin tear to her right lower outer ankle. Findings include: 1. Interview on 9/09/24 at 3:51 p.m. with resident 1 revealed: *She was lying in her bed and stated she had a cut on her right leg that was caused from the metal on her bed when they were putting her to bed after using the bathroom. *She stated she had no other skin concerns. 2. Record review of resident 1's skin alteration evaluations revealed: *On 8/18/24 resident 1 received a skin tear to her right outer ankle while CNA I transferred her into bed. -The skin tear measured 6.0 L X 3.0 W x 0.5 centimeters (cm) deep. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jan 8, 2026
Based on record review, interview, observation, document review, South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incidents (FRI), and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *An environment was free of flammable materials where two of two sampled resdients (2 and 26) were observed smoking. *Assistive devices were used for one of one 1 sampled resident (2) who used cigarette holders to prevent a burn. *Appropriate supervision for one of three sampled resident (26) while smoking. *Facility exit and interior doors functioned appropriately, and staff were re-educated as stated in the corrective actions in the 11/16/25 and 11/26/25 FRI regarding one of one closed sampled resident (37) who eloped outside and entered a room where chemicals were stored. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed infection control practices regarding: *Foley catheters (flexible tubing placed in the bladder to drain urine), tubing and urinary drainage bag placement for two of two sampled residents with foley catheter. *Hand hygiene by one of one registered nurse (RN) D observed administering medications to multiple residents during a noon meal service without sanitizing her hands in between each resident's medication administrations.*One of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) (F) observed without wearing a gown and gloves when transferring a resident (26) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and did not clean the lift after transferring the resident. Findings include:1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jun 15, 2023
Based on record review, interview and policy review the provider failed to ensure the 48 hour nutritional care plans for two of four sampled residents (11 and 22) were updated in their comprehensive care plan. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 11's medical record revealed he: *Was admitted on [DATE]. *Had diagnoses that included: Anemia secondary to blood loss, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and pneumonitis due to inhalation of other solids and liquids. *Was on a consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) diet. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Jun 15, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review the provider failed to ensure quarterly side rail assessments were completed for three of seven residents (4, 5, and 19). 1.Observation on 6/14/23 at 9:00 a.m. of resident 5's room revealed she had a one-half side rail on the left side of her bed. Interview on 6/14/23 at 9:30 a.m. with maintenance director E revealed: *He stated the assessments had been completed in the four months since he began working at this facility. *He provided documentation of a side rail audit with one bed rail audit conducted on 5/30/23 for room [ROOM NUMBER] which was not resident 5's room. *He admitted that he had not done as many assessments as he thought. Interview on 6/14/23 at 3:34 p.m. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 33 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 8, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 12, 2024Standard1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2023Standard2 findings
- Oct 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 17, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jan 13, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 6, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Jun 27, 2018Standard2 findings
- Mar 29, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 18, 2016Standard1 finding
- Mar 5, 2015Standard2 findings
- Feb 12, 2014—3 findings
- Nov 28, 2012—6 findings
- Oct 5, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction