Deficiency Index

Avamere Rehabilitation of Shoreline

Seattle, Washington · CCN 505009

46 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
166
Surveys
46
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/46

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
115
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVAMERE
County
King
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.473.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.90—
Annual nurse turnover42.6%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6669.5%E2526.3%F22.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B22.1%C—
CMS’s current file: 95 of the 166 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6107×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6095×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6774×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Rehabilitation of Shoreline, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Jan 24, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written infection control policies and procedures, follow standards of practice related to hand hygiene/washing, donning (put-on) and doffing (removal) of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and the required isolation/transmission-based precautions when providing housekeeping and maintenance services to fourteen of fourteen residents (Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) reviewed for quarantine and isolation precautions. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jun 27, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that policies and procedures for elopement were effectively implemented by providing necessary supervision, and implementing resident directed care plans for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for elopement and/or avoidable incidents. The facility did not implement its policy and procedure for Resident 1 who was at risk for elopement and was found wandering alone on a busy street by a concerned citizen which required intervention by law enforcement officers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 19, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse (physical and verbal) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure caused harm to Resident 1 who sustained physical injuries including significant bruising and scratches on his left arm, was punched in the head, and psychosocial harm in the form of anger, frustrations, which affected his sleep patterns and mood. Findings included . The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) define abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish . Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 11, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and treat a resident's skin condition, and develop and implement timely interventions to minimize the risk and the development of pressure injuries for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure injury/ulcers. These failures caused harm to Resident 1 who developed an in-house acquired pressure injury and placed other residents of the facility at risk for harm and unmet care needs. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Pressure Injury (Ulcer) definition and stages include: A pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 11, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for avoidable accidents and falls. These failures caused harm to Resident 1 and placed other residents at risk for harm and injury. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation therapy. The resident's diagnoses list included stroke and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], showed the resident had intact cognition and needed two-person physical assistance from staff with bed mobility and transfers. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 166 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 16, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 12, 2026Complaint2 findings
Show the 38 earlier surveys
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • May 17, 2025Standard28 findings
  • Apr 11, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 19, 2024Standard21 findings
  • Feb 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2022Standard16 findings
  • Sep 19, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 27, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 24, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 9, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • May 28, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 8, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Aug 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
  • May 27, 2016Standard12 findings · 3 harm
  • Jan 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2012—5 findings
  • Nov 6, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2012—6 findings
  • Apr 5, 2011—6 findings
  • Feb 15, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction