Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre
Wabash, Indiana · CCN 155162
26 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 84
- Surveys
- 26
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 75
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES
- County
- Wabash · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 106 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
Mar 31, 2026
223 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.59 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 48.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1090.9% | E19.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5751×
Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 12, 2021
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia and at risk for choking received supervision while eating for 1 of 4 residents at risk for choking. This deficient practice resulted in the resident choking, coded and the emergency services being called and the resident hospitalized . The resident later died on [DATE]. (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when a Dietary Aide served Resident B a tray of food and left the resident with no assistance or supervision. The Administrator and Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 1:11 p.m. on [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF803Apr 12, 2021
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia and at risk for choking received a diet in the correct form for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for a risk of choking. This deficient practice resulted in the resident choking, coding and the emergency services being called and resident hospitalized . The resident later died on [DATE]. (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when a Dietary Aide served Resident B a tray of food that was not in the correct form and left the resident to eat. The Administrator and Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 1:11 p.m. on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF575Mar 31, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure required State Agency and Ombudsman contact information was prominently displayed in a location and manner accessible to residents, specifically those utilizing wheelchairs. This deficient practice affected 3 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights and had the potential to affect 21 residents residing on the 3rd floor of the facility. (Residents 5, 7, and 10)Findings include:During a Resident Council group interview, on 3/25/26 at 2:00 p.m., Residents 5, 7, and 10 each indicated they did not know where to find information for the local Ombudsman or where to find information about how to contact the State Agency with concerns. Resident 5 indicated he could ask the Activities Director (AD) for the information. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561Mar 31, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to choose to move within the facility and to spend time outdoors as able for 3 of 3 residents of 21 residents residing on the third floor reviewed for residents' rights. (Residents 5, 7, and 10)Findings include:During a Resident Council group interview, on 3/25/26 at 2:00 p.m., Residents 5, 7, and 10 each indicated the facility placed significant restrictions on their mobility and autonomy. The residents who lived on the third floor were prohibited from accessing the first floor or the outdoor patio without staff supervision. Key barriers included an elevator that required a keypad code, which had not been shared with the residents, and a locked exterior door leading to the patio. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Mar 31, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received bathing assistance according to their assessed needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 7) Findings include:On 3/24/26 at 12:45 p.m., during the lunch meal, Resident 7 was observed seated at a dining table. Resident 7's hair was greasy and disheveled.During the Resident Council group interview, on 3/25/26 at 2:04 p.m., Resident 7 indicated she had not received a shower for over a week. Her hair was still greasy and stringy, and she was wearing the same clothes from the day before. Saturdays and Tuesdays were her scheduled shower days, but she did not receive a shower on either scheduled day. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 84 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 31, 2026Standard4 findings
- Mar 31, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jun 18, 2024Standard3 findings
- Aug 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 6, 2022Standard6 findings
- Jan 25, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Oct 28, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 17, 2021Standard5 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
- Apr 12, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 26, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 25, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 24, 2019Standard3 findings
- May 2, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Oct 11, 2018Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 6, 2018Standard8 findings
- Jul 19, 2017Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 18, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 22, 2016Standard6 findings
- Dec 30, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Sep 26, 2014Standard4 findings
- Nov 18, 2013—5 findings
- Feb 25, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 28, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 18, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 18, 2011—3 findings
- Dec 14, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction