Atherton Park Post-Acute
Menlo Park, California · CCN 555827
38 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 207
- Surveys
- 38
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 160
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- San Mateo
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.90 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.9% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3264.0% | E1122.0% | F714.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6896×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6565×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5543×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Atherton Park Post-Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF755Jun 29, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. One of three sampled residents (Resident 1) receive a medication accurately and in a safe manner in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and professional standards of practice to meet the needs of the resident. Upon the resident's re-admission to the facility from the hospital, the facility staff received information Resident 1 was applied a fentanyl transdermal patch (a potent narcotic/opioid applied to the skin, to treat moderate to severe pain) 25 micrograms per hour (mcg/hr)but the facility failed to ensure the hospital-dispensed patch was removed before a new fentanyl 25 mcg/hr patch one was applied. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 3, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide standby assist (the presence of another person within arm's reach during the performance of one of the activities of daily living) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent fall. This failure had resulted in Resident 1's unwitnessed fall from the toilet to the bathroom floor on 11/15/21, sustaining a thigh fracture. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and skull), and [CONDITION(S)] (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Dec 15, 2023
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the director of dietary services is employed when there was no kitchen manager at the facility after 10/31/23. This failure had the potential for inadequate supervision of the dietary department for 153 residents who ate food from the kitchen out of a census of 153. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/23 at 10:14 a.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD) and Assistant Kitchen Manager (AKM) in the kitchen, there was no kitchen manager. RD stated, We don't have a manager. Currently we don't have the manager . We are interviewing (the manager) . when asked. AKM also acknowledged, they don't have the kitchen manager. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 11:09 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 15, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage in the kitchen when: 1. There were no expiration dates on two chicken flavored base and cranberry flavored juice cocktails in a box in the refrigerator, and one box of the beef patty in the freezer. 2. There were no dates on the ranch dressing on a tray in the refrigerator and ice creams in a cup on a tray in the freezer. 3. There were two boxes of FRESH SHELL EGGS, not pasteurized eggs in the refrigerator. 4. There were expired items in the refrigerator such as one low fat cottage cheese, mayonnaise, and hot sauce. 5. Dish machine temperature logs were not filled completely for November and [DATE]. 6. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF582Jun 8, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage, Form CMS- (SNF ABN, Form Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services- - a written notice used to inform the resident/beneficiary of potential financial liability for the non-covered stay and the right to appeal to receive care and services which may not be covered by Medicare) for three of five sampled residents (Resident 59, Resident 60, and Resident 123) receiving Medicare Part A services. This failure had the potential for residents and/or resident representative of not being aware of the financial liability and the right to appeal for the denial or termination of resident's Medicare Part A services. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 207 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 14, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jun 27, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Feb 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 30 earlier surveys
- Dec 15, 2023Standard and complaint16 findings
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 14, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Jul 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 3, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 3, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jun 8, 2021Standard14 findings
- Dec 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2019Standard25 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2018Standard14 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 4, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Sep 13, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Mar 17, 2017Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 4, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2016Standard12 findings
- Jan 13, 2015Standard14 findings
- Apr 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 21, 2014Standard13 findings
- Jul 8, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 11, 2013—15 findings
- Jun 29, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 22, 2011—14 findings
- Dec 20, 2010—18 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction