Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill
Pleasant Hill, Missouri · CCN 265565
31 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 131
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Cass
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 9, 2026
153 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.47 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.27 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,433 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3556.5% | E2032.3% | F46.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5783×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5823×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5672×
Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Mar 20, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ascertain the resident's code status before initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, refers to any medical intervention used to restore circulatory and/or respiratory function that has ceased) for one sampled resident (Resident #5) who was a do not resuscitate (DNR) status out of 5 sampled residents. On [DATE], Registered Nurse (RN) A found the resident without spontaneous respirations and pulse and started CPR. The resident was resuscitated after CPR was performed and was taken by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the hospital and subsequently died [DATE] after he/she was placed on comfort care. The facility census was 79 residents. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 9, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect when facility staff failed to appropriately assess and respond to one sampled resident (Resident #1), who had a recent [CONDITION(S)] and two stent placements. On 4/3/21 the resident had frequent and ongoing complaints of chest pain in the early hours of the morning to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. Facility staff did not notify the physician or the paramedics. As a result of the lack of notification, the resident notified a family member who contacted local paramedics. Upon arrival at 6:00 A.M., paramedic assessment found the resident had elevated blood pressure and elevated pulse. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 9, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive investigation was completed that included details of the circumstances of the fall, failed to complete a fall risk analysis of what occurred to cause the fall, failed to update the care plan and add interventions implemented to prevent the fall from recurring, and failed to complete a post fall assessment and failed to access for injuries for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of three sampled residents who fell on 6/4/26 sustaining significant pain and bruising to the left side of face, head and neck. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1), who had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility census was 67 residents. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source policy, dated February 8, 2018 showed: -Residents have a right to be free of abuse. -Abuse is defined as willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful means the individual must have acted deliberately (not inadvertently or accidentally), not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF839Mar 14, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Unlicensed Registered Nurse (RN) A had a valid registered nurse (RN) license in order to provide nursing care to residents such as assessments, wound care, medication administration and all nursing cares allowed by law. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78 residents. On 3/14/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place over a period of time to include 5/3/24 through 1/30/25. Nurse licensing and state issued identification discrepancies were discovered during audits by the facility Wound Nurse. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 131 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 9, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2024Standard18 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Apr 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 17, 2023Standard12 findings
- Dec 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 13, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jun 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Nov 9, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 24, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Apr 9, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 27, 2020Standard22 findings · 1 harm
- May 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 11, 2019Standard10 findings
- Jan 10, 2018Standard15 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2017Standard5 findings
- Feb 26, 2016Standard1 finding
- Mar 27, 2015Standard5 findings
- Mar 21, 2014Standard7 findings
- Sep 10, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 9, 2011—8 findings
- Oct 29, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction