Aspire Senior Living Platte City
Platte City, Missouri · CCN 265696
36 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 185
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 97
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Platte
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Apr 29, 2026
194 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.16 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 66.2% | 60.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $70,892 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2637.1% | E4057.1% | F22.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C11.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living Platte City, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Jun 6, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure two sampled resident's (Resident #1 and #2) code status was correct at the time of admission and carried out in accordance with the guardian's directive to staff. Resident #1's guardian directed Registered Nurse (RN) A upon admission on [DATE] and to RN B on [DATE] to change the resident's code status to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). On [DATE], the resident stopped spontaneous respirations and pulse and facility staff initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called to the facility and took over CPR from facility staff. CPR was performed for one hour and 13 minutes. The resident was declared deceased at the facility on [DATE] at 2:16 A.M. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 8, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight on the facility's secured unit to prevent two residents from ingesting [MEDICATION(S)] (meth, highly addictive stimulant) which affected two residents (Residents #1 and #2). The facility failed to update the care plans after the residents ingested meth, which affected two residents (Residents #1 and #2). The facility failed to monitor facility windows on a routine basis and failed to ensure that broken/missing windows and screens were immediately replaced on the secured unit. The facility failed to assess the residents for elopement risk and put into place a care plan for elopement which affected two residents (Residents #1 and #2). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 22, 2021
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly report a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Residents #1 ) when Resident #1 developed chest pain and shortness of breath. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility policy, dated March 2015, on resident change in condition showed: - Purpose of the policy to observe, record, and report any change in condition so that proper treatment can be implemented. - Notify the resident's physician and responsible party. - Monitor the resident frequently until stable. Review of the facility policy, dated March 2015, on emergency care, showed: - The purpose of the policy was to provide emergency care for any condition that would require the use of emergency services. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 16, 2021
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff properly intervened when a resident became bradycardic (slow heart rate) and also became bradyapnic (slow respirations). This affected one of two sampled residents (Resident #1). The faciltiy census was 50. 1. Review of the facility policy, dated [DATE] on emergency care, showed: - Staff must call a resident's physician and responsible party if the resident's condition changed. - Staff must call 911 if a resident was not breathing. Review of the undated emergency cart check list showed: - This check is to be done EVERY night by licensed nurse. - Staff to initial and date each box when items were checked. - Gave a list of items in the emergency cart. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804May 9, 2024
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature to the residents when hot food was not served at an appetizing temperature to seven of the 17 sampled residents (Resident #8, #2, #58, #27, #56, #55, and #212). The facility census was 66. Review of facility policy, food and drink, dated 1/30/24, showed: -Food prepared by methods that provides nutritive value, flavor and appearance; -Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature Review of food safety policy, dated 1/30/24, showed: -Facility must store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 185 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2025Standard13 findings
- Apr 10, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 15, 2025Complaint7 findings
- Jun 6, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 9, 2024Standard31 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2022Standard12 findings
- Jul 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 22, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 30, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Mar 16, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 5, 2020Complaint9 findings
- Nov 13, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jul 25, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Standard9 findings
- Apr 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2017Standard10 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Standard7 findings
- Aug 6, 2015Standard9 findings
- Jul 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
- May 7, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 25, 2014Standard17 findings
- Jan 17, 2014—3 findings
- Oct 21, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 11, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 27, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 1, 2012—3 findings
- Jul 25, 2011—18 findings
- Jan 28, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction