Ascend at Aurora
Aurora, Missouri · CCN 265182
28 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 104
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 125
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Lawrence · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1983
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jul 27, 2026
105 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.24 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.57 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.4% | 57.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $46,940 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J23.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3360.0% | E1425.5% | F610.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F7583×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ascend at Aurora, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 12, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #48), who is non-verbal and dependent on staff for all personal needs and mobility, was free from mental abuse by staff when one staff member, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S, purposely made comments to the resident to upset him/her. The resident was visually upset when discussing the CNA and the comments made to him/her, including becoming red faced, teary eyed, reaching out his/her arm and grunting. A sample of 26 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. On 2/8/24, SLCR completed a complaint investigation at the facility regarding an allegation of the resident not being treated with dignity and was unable to verify deficient practice occurred. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Apr 12, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication errors when staff administered a fentanyl patch (a narcotic patch placed on the skin to treat moderate to severe pain) and hydrocodone-APAP (narcotic that is used for relief of severe pain) to one resident (Resident #162) without orders, resulting in significant side effects and hospitalization . A sample of 26 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 60. The Administrator was notified on [DATE], at 2:28 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The resident went to the hospital and did not readmit to the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Aug 19, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse when one resident (Resident #2) touched another resident (Resident #1), who did not have the capacity to consent, by fondling his/her breasts on multiple occasions. The facility census was 41. The administrator was notified on 08/16/2021 at 5:05 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 08/14/2021. The IJ was removed on 08/17/2021, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Aug 19, 2021
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete timely and thorough investigations of allegations of abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) and failed to take immediate steps to protect all residents after becoming aware of the allegation of abuse. The facility census was 41. The administrator was notified on 08/16/2021 at 5:05 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 08/14/2021. The IJ was removed on 08/17/2021, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated 11/2018, showed the following: -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator; -The facility Administrator would ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 1, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure all residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, when staff failed to follow one resident's (Resident #2), with a history of falls, care plan and left the resident alone in the shower resulting in the resident suffering laceration (a deep cut or tear in skin or flesh) to the back of the resident's head due to falling. The facility census was 57. Record review of the facility's policy titled Fall Policy, revised 9/17/29, showed the following: -Residents found to be at high risk for falls are placed on the Fall Program and interventions are implemented to meet individual needs. 1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 104 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Jul 10, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 18, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 12, 2024Standard17 findings · 2 harm
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Aug 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 19, 2022Complaint3 findings
- May 11, 2022Standard19 findings
- Aug 19, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 30, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 29, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Dec 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2019Standard7 findings
- Mar 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 24, 2018Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 4, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jul 15, 2016Standard1 finding
- Oct 1, 2015Standard3 findings
- Aug 8, 2014Standard4 findings
- Aug 10, 2012—5 findings
- Jul 12, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction