Deficiency Index

Arroyo Vista Nursing Center

San Diego, California · CCN 055505

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
80
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
53
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
San Diego
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jan 29, 2026

284 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.284.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1973.1%E726.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 80 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6982×

    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Arroyo Vista Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF660Jun 3, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility did not communicate with or properly prepare Resident 1's caregiver for the discharge needs of Resident 1. As a result, Resident 1 was discharged home and did not receive the assistance needed to perform his activities of daily living (routine activities people do, such as feeding, bathing, dressing, and grooming). Resident 1 was found in pain and was taken to the hospital where he was diagnosed with weakness and tachycardia (fast heart rate) related to dehydration (a harmful reduction in the amount of water in the body). Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jan 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document nursing care in an accurate, concise manner when:1. Wound treatments were not documented for one of two residents (Resident 36); and,2. Skin observations were documented as being performed for one of two residents (Resident 60) with a condom catheter (a non-invasive device for males that looks like a condom, fits over the penis, and has a tube to drain urine into a collection bag), when no condom catheter was present, when reviewed for documentation.These failures had the potential for Resident 36 and Resident 60's clinical record to be incomplete and inaccurate. Findings:1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen for food storage methods, according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. Multiple food items were not dated correctly. 2. The ice machine was observed to have black residue inside the ice bin and the water filter for the ice machine was 45 days past the due date to be changed. These failures had the potential for food contamination, which could result in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. The census was 42. Findings: 1. An initial kitchen tour with [NAME] (CK) 1 was conducted on [DATE] at 7:45 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control procedures when: 1. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- a device that delivers oxygen) machine mask and tubing were not stored in a sanitary manner. 2a. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control procedures to lessen the risk of cross-contamination) were not implemented for three rooms and, 2b. Visitors were not educated regarding the need for hand hygiene. This failure had the potential for the spread of infection to other residents in the facility. Findings: 1. According to the Admission Record, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included obstructive sleep apnea (a condition in which breathing is interrupted during sleep). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Oct 10, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal (a type of bacterial lung infection) vaccine to four of ten residents (Residents 18, 71, 105, and 201) reviewed for immunizations. This failure posed the risk of the residents contracting pneumonia and its associated complications. Findings: 1. According to a review of Resident 18's Admission Record, the resident was over [AGE] years old. During a review of Resident 18's immunization record, there was no indication the resident was offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 80 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 29, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Apr 11, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 10, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Sep 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Dec 15, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Jan 20, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Feb 3, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Dec 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jan 24, 2014—3 findings
  • Jan 11, 2013—3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2012—8 findings
  • Feb 4, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction