Arrington Living Center
Collins, Mississippi · CCN 255331
10 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Government - City/county
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Covington · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2011
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 1, 2025
557 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.61 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.96 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.8% | 35.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,727 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G342.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D342.9% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C114.3% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Arrington Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 1, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) inappropriately transferred a dependent resident, resulting in a fractured femur for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for accidents, Resident #3. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 4/24/25, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) with measures put in place to correct the deficiency effective 4/25/25, prior to the State Agency (SA) entrance on 4/29/25. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 15, 2024
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention for a resident transfer with a stand mechanical lift, resulting in left ankle fractures for one (1) of three (3) resident care plans reviewed. Resident #1. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Plan of Care, revised 10/10/22, revealed POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to .implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 15, 2024
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards during a transfer when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transferred Resident #1 from the wheelchair to the bed without using the required stand mechanical lift, resulting in left ankle fractures for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accident/hazards. Resident #1. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF638May 1, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and submit Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe of no more than ninety-two (92) days from the prior assessment for two (2) of nineteen (19) sampled residents, Resident #21 and Resident #42. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, MDS Assessments, revised 2/18/25, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a .standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity .Types of .Assessments .e. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Sep 15, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to wash a resident's hair, who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident #17 Findings Include: On 09/12/22 at 9:21 AM, during an observation and interview with Resident #17 stated she gets a bath once a week. The resident's hair looked oily and unclean. Resident #17 states that she gets her hair washed sometimes. On 09/13/22 at 8:58 AM, in an observation and interview with Resident #17 said I have not had a bath this week. The resident's hair continues to look oily and unclean. On 09/14/22 at 3:30 PM, in an observation and interview with Resident #17 stated she still has not had a bath this week and has never refused one. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 1, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 15, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 15, 2022Standard3 findings
- Aug 1, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Standard3 findings
- Mar 2, 2017Standard1 finding
- Mar 7, 2015Standard6 findings
- Apr 11, 2014Standard3 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Mar 28, 2013—10 findings
- May 31, 2012—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction