Aria of Waukesha
Waukesha, Wisconsin · CCN 525490
27 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 113
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 105
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Waukesha
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Feb 16, 2026
266 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.66 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.69 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.5% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $81,965 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1664.0% | E312.0% | F312.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aria of Waukesha, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Aug 17, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed for abuse.On 7/21/26, staff reported seeing R2 touching R1's breasts and thigh. R1 was screaming for R2 to stop. The staff who observed it did not report the incident until the next day. There were no interventions put into place to protect R1 from additional sexual contact. During investigation into the first incident, the facility learned of a second incident where R2 was observed touching R1's breasts and thighs. The exact date of this incident was unknown. The incident was not immediately reported to facility administration. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 15, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents/supervision. The facility did not correctly assess R1's risk for elopement and, thus, did not implement interventions to monitor and supervise R1 to prevent R1 from eloping from the facility. The facility had gaps in the monitoring of the main entrance of the building once the alarm system was turned off and before the area was staffed for the day, allowing R1 to leave the facility unnoticed by staff. R1 was returned to the facility 8 hours later when his family found him 20 miles away from the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Mar 15, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries and did not ensure residents received necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of existing pressure injuries for 3 of 5 (R159, R35, and R156 ) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R159 developed a pressure injury to her right ishial tuberosity. The pressure injury was not assessed, staged or measured. treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This failure resulted in decline of the wound to a stage 4 pressure injury. The Facility failure to comprehensively assess, measure and implement treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 16, 2026
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with a pressure injury was comprehensively assessed. This was observed with 1(R47) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injury. * R47 was re-admitted into the facility from the hospital on 1/5/26. The medical record documents a stage 2 wound on the coccyx, with only a measurement, on 1/5/26. On 1/8/26, the wound consult assessment assesses stage 3 pressure injury with treatment. The medical record does not have documentation of treatment implementation until 1/8/26, along with a revised plan of care not initiated until 1/29/26. This resulted in actual harm to R47.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure Wound Management-Wound Prevention and Treatment dated 10/11/24. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 18, 2023
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure quality of care was provided to 3 (R3, R19, and R18) of 24 residents reviewed. *R3 had diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. From 12/19/22 to 12/21/22 R3 experienced severe constipation and was hospitalized due to an obstructed bowel. The facility did not have a comprehensive care plan in place to address R3's bowel management and diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. *R19 had a skin condition that was not comprehensively assessed by the facility or addressed with a comprehensive skin integrity care plan. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 113 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 17, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 16, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 11, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jun 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 17, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Apr 18, 2023Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 27, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 22, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Apr 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Mar 15, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 21, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Aug 4, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 26, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 11, 2019Complaint5 findings
- Jan 17, 2019Standard1 finding
- Sep 25, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 31, 2017Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 20, 2016Standard7 findings
- May 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 13, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jan 21, 2014—10 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 20, 2012—4 findings
- Nov 21, 2011—4 findings
- May 25, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction