Apple Rehab Middletown
Middletown, Connecticut · CCN 075089
34 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 166
- Surveys
- 34
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- APPLE REHAB
- County
- Lower Ct River Vly
- Medicare-certified since
- 1969
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Jun 10, 2026
152 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.27 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.54 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.5% | 40.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4477.2% | E814.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B47.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8425×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Apple Rehab Middletown, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Jun 8, 2026
Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #'s 8, 18, and 62) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to complete nutritional assessments within the required time allotted parameters and additionally, for Resident #18 and Resident #62 failed to prevent a significant weight loss. The findings include: 1. Resident #18's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and muscle weakness. The facility Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 8:55 PM identified Resident #18 weighed 177 pounds, had adequate nutrition and hydration, and was at mild risk for skin breakdown with Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) to the coccyx. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Jun 8, 2026
Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy for 3 of 3 units, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment by ensuring bathroom fans were clean. The findings include:Observation of 20 out of 29 resident bathrooms on 6/1/26 at 10:15 AM identified ceiling vents exhibited a significant buildup of dust/debris . Observation and interview with the Director of Maintenance 6/2/26 at 11:10 am with the Director of Maintenance, identified a significant buildup of dust on the ceiling vents in 20 out of 29 resident bathrooms. The Director of Maintenance indicated that the bathroom vents are cleaned a couple times per year and that it was his responsibility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF554Oct 7, 2024
Based on clinical record reviews, observation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #17 and Resident #52) reviewed for self-medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication self-administration assessment were completed according to policy for a resident receiving medication assisted therapy. The findings include: 1. Resident #17's diagnoses included opioids use and psychoactive substance abuse. The Self Administration of Medications assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #17 wished to self-administer medications, was alert, oriented, able to name medication, dose, side effects, was physically able to open medications as packaged and drink water independently. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Oct 7, 2024
Based on observations, clinical record reviews , facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization ( Resident #6), the facility failed to ensure medication was available for the resident and for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing( Residents #26, 27 and #52), the facility failed to ensure staff consistently provided evidence of the provision of showers, and for 1 resident ( Resident #215), reviewed for admission nursing assessment, the facility failed to ensure a body audit was completed on admission to ensure treatment orders were followed as prescribed by the physician and for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #415) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to initiate a new treatment order per physician and for 1 of 2 residents (… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925Oct 7, 2024
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dry food storage to ensure the area was free from insects and failed to follow recommendations their pest control program. The findings include: The facility pest control log identified a service report by an outside pest control company dated 6/22/24 indicating one fly light was installed in the kitchen storage area. The service report also indicated, under a sanitation/housekeeping section, that bananas needed to be covered. A Pest Control Service Report dated 7/26/2024 indicated fruit flies were noted by a food cart in the hallway and that recommendations were to remove the carts from the hallway. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 166 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 10, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Jun 8, 2026Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- May 13, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Dec 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 7, 2024Standard and complaint20 findings
- May 22, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 26 earlier surveys
- Nov 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 5, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Aug 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 21, 2023Complaint5 findings
- Nov 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 10, 2022Standard14 findings
- Sep 27, 2021Complaint7 findings
- Apr 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Aug 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 15, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jun 25, 2018Standard6 findings
- Jun 18, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 18, 2017Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 16, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- May 14, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 3, 2014Standard9 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 14, 2013—4 findings
- Dec 10, 2012—4 findings
- Nov 15, 2011—10 findings
- May 11, 2011—2 findings
- Sep 22, 2010—5 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction