Apple Rehab Guilford
Guilford, Connecticut · CCN 075144
20 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 106
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- APPLE REHAB
- County
- South Central Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Nov 18, 2025
356 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.20 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.9% | 40.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3487.2% | E37.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B25.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Apple Rehab Guilford, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Aug 11, 2022
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review and interviews for 12 of 27 residents (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) who were reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely when medication administration due at 9 and 10 PM on 7/23/2022 was not completed timely, in accordance with physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The findings include: Review of the facility reportable event dated 7/25/2022 identified while the facility was reviewing nurse performance for the 7/23/2022 evening shift, it was noted that 12 residents lacked signatures from RN #1 on the Electronic Medication Administration Record [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Aug 11, 2022
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review and interviews for 12 of 27 residents (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, and #22) observed during medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications administered timely. The findings include: A). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Feb 25, 2025
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 residents (Resident #33, 45, 70 and 85) the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice. For 3 of 3 residents, (Resident #33, 45 and 85), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed according to the facility policy after the residents fell either without a witness or had a head strike, and for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #70) who were at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the LAL (low air loss) mattress was set according to the manufacturer recommendations, and failed to ensure the Braden Scale and the weekly body audits were completed per facility policy. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 25, 2025
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were routinely monitored prior to food service. The findings include: The facility's Cooked Foods Temperature Chart identified food temperatures must be documented when the food item completes the cooking process; supper food items included soup, meat, puree meat, ground meat, potato/starch, puree starch, vegetable, puree vegetable, and other. Review of the Cooked Foods Temperature Charts dated 12/17/24 through 1/4/25 and 1/12/25 through 2/22/25 failed to identify supper temperatures were documented on the following dates: 12/18/24 only soup and meat temperatures were documented, 12/25/24, 12/27/24, 12/30/24, 12/31/24 1/3/25, 1/4/25, 1/13/25, 1/14/25, 1/16/25,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Oct 19, 2022
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a clean and comfortable homelike environment. The findings include: Observations on 10/17/22 at 10:40 AM through 11:40 AM, and on 10/17/22 at 2:18 PM with the Maintenance Supervisor, and the Housekeeping Manager identified the following issues: a. Damaged, chipped and/or marred bedroom walls on [NAME] unit in rooms 5, and 16. [NAME] unit in rooms 21, 22, 24, 28, 29, 31, and 32. East River unit in rooms 35, 36, 38, and 49. b. Damaged, chipped, rusty, and/or marred door frames in the bathroom on [NAME] unit in rooms 1, shower room. [NAME] unit in rooms 22, 21, and 24. East River unit in room 49. c. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 106 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
- Sep 13, 2024Complaint6 findings
- Aug 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 19, 2022Standard12 findings
- Aug 11, 2022Complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 21, 2022Infection control3 findings
- Jul 7, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- May 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 2, 2020Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 3, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 9, 2018Standard3 findings
- Dec 8, 2016Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 13, 2015Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 11, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—7 findings
- Dec 13, 2012—6 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 27, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 9, 2011—3 findings
- Aug 12, 2010—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction