Aperion Care Tolleston Park
Gary, Indiana · CCN 155580
72 surveys since 2010, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 378
- Surveys
- 72
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 178
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- APERION CARE
- County
- Lake
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 53 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.22 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.9% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4584.9% | E611.3% | F11.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6845×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6774×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aperion Care Tolleston Park, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Feb 16, 2022
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a risk for hazards to residents did not occur related to a resident who was deemed unable to maintain her own smoking materials due to safety, repeatedly keeping her smoking materials on her person without facility intervention, the resident continued to light cigarettes inside the facility, and placed a lit cigarette in the trash can, causing a fire which activated the fire alarm and had to be extinguished. All residents in the facility not residing on the 2 locked, inaccessible units were at risk for fire hazards related to unsafe smoking. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Jun 11, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable pressure ulcer for an at-risk dependent resident resulting in the resident developing a facility-acquired stage four (full thickness of the skin) pressure ulcer with infection to the buttocks one month after admission to the facility. (Resident B)The immediate jeopardy began on 5/26/26, when the nursing staff found a malodorous stage four pressure ulcer to the buttocks which tested positive for infection when cultured. The Administrator, RN Corporate Wound Specialist, RN Consultant, Corporate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 6/10/26 at 3:06 p.m. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 18, 2021
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement adequate supervision measures to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the building. The resident left the building unattended around 7:45 p.m. on 11/3/21 wearing pajamas and socks and was overheard knocking on the door he exited from 50 minutes later. The resident was assessed upon his return and transferred to the facility's secure unit. The facility is located within 1 mile of a major interstate and adjacent to a busy 2 lane road. (Resident B) The immediate jeopardy began on 11/3/21 when the resident had exited the facility without supervision or knowledge of facility staff. The resident was able to exit from the North door. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 25, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions related to expired food in the reach in cooler, a dirty oven hood, grease build up on the stove, as well as touching food items with a gloved hand and the lack of hand hygiene after glove removal. This had the potential to affect the 125 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial kitchen tour, on [DATE] at 9:15 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), indicated the following: a. There were 3 bowls of pudding, dated [DATE], in the reach in cooler. b. The flour scoop was stored directly in the flour. c. The oven hood had a heavy accumulation of dirt and grease noted in all the slats. d. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 5, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions related to food not labeled and dated and touching food items with a gloved hand. This had the potential to affect the 126 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Finding includes: Observation during the initial kitchen tour, on 7/31/22 at 8:51 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), indicated the following: a. A stainless steel container in the reach in cooler containing an orange substance that was not labeled or dated. There was also a stainless steel container of applesauce that was not dated and 3 plastic containers of sliced peaches that were not dated. Interview with the DFM at that time, indicated the items should have been dated. b. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 378 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 24, 2026Standard and complaint15 findings
- Dec 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 24, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
- Feb 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 64 earlier surveys
- Nov 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2023Standard and complaint17 findings
- Jun 30, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Mar 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Aug 5, 2022Standard and complaint18 findings
- Apr 6, 2022Complaint7 findings
- Feb 16, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 2, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Nov 18, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 20, 2021Standard16 findings
- May 28, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Feb 18, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Aug 27, 2020Complaint9 findings
- Jul 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 17, 2020Standard21 findings
- Sep 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2019Standard and complaint31 findings
- Sep 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2018Standard24 findings
- Jan 29, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 20, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jun 1, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Apr 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2017Standard12 findings
- Jan 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Apr 26, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Apr 4, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
- Feb 1, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 8, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 4, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jul 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 7, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Jun 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jan 13, 2015Standard and complaint19 findings
- Oct 2, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Sep 10, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 23, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Apr 2, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Feb 13, 2014—4 findings
- Jan 3, 2014—3 findings
- Nov 18, 2013—10 findings
- Oct 8, 2013—3 findings
- Aug 23, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 26, 2013—3 findings
- Feb 4, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2012—12 findings
- Apr 16, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 23, 2011—23 findings · 3 harm
- May 17, 2011—5 findings
- Mar 10, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 26, 2011Complaint7 findings · 4 harm
- Nov 17, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction