Angel Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina · CCN 425323
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 55
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 88
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- IVY HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Horry
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 7, 2026
275 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.25 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.36 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.3% | 47.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,788 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G112.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D562.5% | E112.5% | F112.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Angel Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 7, 2026
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and accident prevention for 1 (Resident (R)65) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The failure resulted in R65 sustaining a right 11th rib fracture on 09/02/2025 after the resident fell. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, revised on 10/06/2025, revealed, The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s). 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s). 4. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 21, 2023
Based on review of the facility's policy, record review, video surveillance review and interviews, the facility failed to protect Resident (R)4 from physical abuse by R5, 2 of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last revised 9/22, revealed It is policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 19, 2022
Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide food storage in a safe manner in 1 of 1 main kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety with an implementation date of March 2022, revealed Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. Policy Explanation and Complaisance for Staffing: 6. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 14, 2021
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and other infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure multi-use vital sign equipment (blood pressure curve and pulsed oximeter) was disinfected between residents' use for four of four residents (Rooms #217, #218, #220, and #222) observed; and 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Oct 19, 2022
Based on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 8 residents, (Resident (R)13, R68, R53, and R73), had their call light within reach. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated August 2022, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside . to allow residents to call for assistance. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All staff will be educated on . ensuring resident access to call light. 5. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 55 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 7, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 21, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
- Mar 21, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 19, 2022Standard5 findings
- Jun 25, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jun 17, 2021Standard1 finding
- Jan 14, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Apr 18, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jun 20, 2019Standard2 findings
- May 4, 2018Standard4 findings
- Jan 20, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 11, 2016Standard17 findings · 6 harm
- Oct 10, 2014Standard2 findings
- May 17, 2013—7 findings
- Jul 11, 2012—2 findings
- May 4, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction