Allure of Walnut
Walnut, Illinois · CCN 146063
16 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 71
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES
- County
- Bureau · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 24, 2025
564 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.38 | 3.43 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.5% | 45.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D13100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Allure of Walnut, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Apr 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review) rescreen after the emergence of a newly diagnosed severe mental illness for two of three residents (R4, R27) reviewed for PASARR screening, in the sample of 24. Findings include: The (undated) facility policy, Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASARR (Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review) Program directs staff, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Apr 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II screening was completed for one of three residents (R31) reviewed for PASARR screenings in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facility's Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) policy documents the following: All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. This same policy documents, Positive Level I Screen- necessitates a PASARR Level II evaluation prior to admission. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Apr 24, 2025
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pressure ulcer treatment was completed as ordered for one of two residents (R31) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facility's Wound Treatment Management policy (dated 2024) documents the following; Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. R31's Wound Evaluation and Management Summary (dated 04/22/25) documents the following after V8 (Wound Physician) examined R31 on 04/22/25: Stage III pressure wound of the left sacrum full thickness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Apr 24, 2025
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a range of motion program was implemented for a resident with functional limitations for one of four residents (R31) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 24. Findings include: R31's Medical Record documents R31's current diagnoses to include: Parkinson's Disease with Dyskinesia; Adult Failure to Thrive, and Chronic Pain. R31's Minimum Data Set Assessment (dated 03/13/25) documents the following in Section GG: R31 has impairment on both sides of his lower extremities. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693Apr 24, 2025
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure tubing for an enteral tube feeding was dated, and items utilized during a tube feeding remained clean for one of two residents (R1) reviewed for tube feedings in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facility's Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes policy (dated 2024) documents, It is a policy of this facility to utilize feeding tubes in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 71 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 24, 2025Standard7 findings
- Mar 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 23, 2024Standard3 findings
- Aug 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2023Standard1 finding
- Mar 25, 2021Standard2 findings
- Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2019Standard5 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Mar 29, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jul 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 10, 2015Standard7 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard7 findings
- Apr 5, 2013—4 findings
- May 24, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 2, 2011—16 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction