Alaris Health at Cedar Grove
Cedar Grove, New Jersey · CCN 315357
18 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 78
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 230
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ALARIS HEALTH
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.
Last survey on record
Apr 8, 2026
215 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.15 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.79 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.0% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2969.0% | E1023.8% | F12.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F7122×
Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Alaris Health at Cedar Grove, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 20, 2023
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident #182) from abuse by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) by failing to ensure: a.) the facility policy was followed to identify an allegation of abuse, b.) that upon receiving an allegation of abuse on 01/17/23 during the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift, the facility immediately protected Resident #182, and other residents from potential abuse, and c.) a thorough investigation was immediately initiated. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, and on 1 of 4 resident units. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 20, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide adequate supervision, b.) follow the facility accident policy and initiate new fall prevention interventions in response to falls, and c.) implement existing interventions to prevent falls (5 of 6 falls reviewed were determined that the resident was left unsupervised). These failures resulted in Resident #92 sustaining multiple falls including a fall on 11/08/21 that required an emergency room transfer on 11/08/21, when Resident #92 fell out of a wheelchair, hit a tray table, sustained a laceration to the right frontal scalp, and was admitted to the hospital with a mechanical fall with head trauma and laceration without obvious intracranial… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF607Jan 20, 2023
Based on interview, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to have written procedures in place to ensure: a.) all residents were protected from abuse when an allegation of staff to resident abuse occurred, b.) a process was in place for identifying other potential victims of abuse, and c.) a process to ensure all potential witnesses/persons aware of the allegation were interviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced for 4 of 4 resident units, and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, and occurred when an allegation of abuse by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) against a resident (Resident #182) was received on 01/17/23 and CNA #1 proceeded to work a resident care shift the following day, 01/18/23, and had access to Resident #182 and other residents… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Sep 18, 2025
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and provide readily accessible medical documents for 1 (one) of 32 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for medical records. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/11/25 at 11:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in bed, awake, and able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 9/16/25 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Health Record (eHR)/ hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #4, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus (increased blood sugar level) due to… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Jul 9, 2024
Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire. This deficient practice was identified for three (3) of five (5) newly hired licensed staff reviewed, (Staff #5, #8 and #10). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On On 6/27/24 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed five of ten randomly selected new employee files. The review for license verification for one of the new licensed employees revealed the following: Staff #5, a Social Worker, hired 8/21/23, had a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs license verification printout was dated 10/02/23. The verification was completed after the staff member was hired. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 78 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 8, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Sep 18, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jul 9, 2024Standard19 findings
- Jan 20, 2023Standard13 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 5, 2020Standard1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Feb 25, 2019Standard2 findings
- Dec 12, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 21, 2016Standard5 findings
- Sep 22, 2015Standard2 findings
- Mar 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 8, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
- Sep 16, 2013—8 findings
- Jul 26, 2012—5 findings
- May 17, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction