Akron Care Center, INC
Akron, Iowa · CCN 165595
17 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 51
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- Government - City
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Plymouth · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.80 | 4.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.89 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.4% | 30.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Akron Care Center, INC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 20, 2022
Based on observation, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to date food in storage, store utensils in a sanitary manner, and discard expired food. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 9:27 AM in the main kitchen revealed a measuring scoop stored inside a thickener container and storage bins containing flour and sugar were not dated. Observation on [DATE] at 10:49 AM in the blue neighborhood kitchen revealed a measuring scoop stored inside a thickener container and an open can of soup in the refrigerator dated [DATE]. Observation on [DATE] at 12:17 AM in the blue neighborhood kitchen revealed the same open can of soup from observation on [DATE] at 10:49 AM in the refrigerator dated [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Jun 18, 2026
Based on observations, staff interviews and Electronic Health Record (EHR) review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences by not placing a resident's call light to be within reach for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 41 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 that indicated severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Jun 18, 2026
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards by not completing appropriate hand hygiene during meal service to prevent cross contamination. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.Findings include:On 6/17/26 at 11:30 AM an observation of Staff D, AM [NAME] revealed Staff D prepare a grilled cheese sandwich. Staff D applied gloves, picked up bread bag with both hands, removed bread from sack with both hands, picked up butter container with both hands, picked up knife with right hand, placed bread on the counter top, applied butter to both slices of bread, removed gloves, applied gloves, no hand hygiene completed, left hand opened plastic bag, removed cheese with right hand, 1 slice of bread, 1 slice of bread… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644May 1, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the PreAdmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements, (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 16, 2024
Based on clinical record review, facility record review and staff interviews the facility failed to assess and provide appropriate intervention to a left lumbar skin tear which resulted in a decline to cellulitis which required use of antibiotic for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #39). The facility reported a census of 43 residents Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #39 documented diagnoses of anemia, hypertension, depression, and dementia. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 51 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard2 findings
- May 1, 2025Standard1 finding
- May 16, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jan 20, 2022Standard2 findings
- Sep 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 5, 2020Standard3 findings
- Nov 16, 2017Standard4 findings
- Oct 13, 2016Standard1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Nov 5, 2015Standard2 findings
- Sep 25, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 26, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 7, 2012—11 findings
- Jan 10, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 7, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 12, 2011—9 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 29, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 4, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction