Deficiency Index

Ahc Mckenzie

MC Kenzie, Tennessee · CCN 445429

9 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
21
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Carroll · rural
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 1, 2026

222 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.243.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover60.0%52.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 21 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ahc Mckenzie, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 1, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to report suspected abuse for 1 of 19 (Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Plan, revised on 11/2/2023, revealed .All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/ misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842May 12, 2022

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records related to dietary intake for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #16 and #53) reviewed for Nutrition. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #16 was cognitively intact and required set-up help only with dining. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 21 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 1, 2026Standard1 finding
  • May 12, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Aug 31, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Sep 9, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Apr 17, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2012—2 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Oct 20, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction