Deficiency Index

Advanced Healthcare of Mesa

Mesa, Arizona · CCN 035266

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
34
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
38
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ADVANCED HEALTH CARE
County
Maricopa
Medicare-certified since
2006

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 5, 2025

430 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.253.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.54—
Annual nurse turnover36.5%48.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E112.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 34 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Advanced Healthcare of Mesa, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Nov 9, 2023

    Based on facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#86, #26) were notified in writing regarding the reason for transfer and a copy was sent to the ombudsman. Findings include: Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left knee joint, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic pain syndrome. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A progress note dated November 14, 2021 at 4:17 PM revealed that the resident had a rapid Covid test and tested positive earlier today. The resident complained of shortness of breath, with wet cough. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Sep 5, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written abuse policy and procedures were followed and adhered to regulations regarding the alleged abuse of one resident (Resident #20). This deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being appropriately handled.Findings include:Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of the pelvis, one rib, sacrum, and vertebra, bacterial infections of unspecified site, chronic kidney disease, depression, and insomnia.An initial pool interview was conducted with Resident #20 on September 2, 2025, at 10:15 AM. During the interview, the resident stated that some of the staff are strange. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Sep 5, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #20) was reported to the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner. This deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being reported and investigated.Findings include:Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of the pelvis, one rib, sacrum, and vertebra, bacterial infections of unspecified site, chronic kidney disease, depression, and insomnia.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.An initial pool interview was conducted with Resident #20 on… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Sep 5, 2025

    Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident or resident representative that specifies duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility for one resident (#48). The deficient practice could result in residents not being able to exercise their right to return to the facility of choice. Number of residents sampled: 12Number of residents cited: 1 Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included sepsis, anemia and hypertension.A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.0,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Oct 18, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and facility failed to properly complete a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31. The deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs of the residents. Findings include: Resident #31 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of surgical wound infections, peritoneal abscess, elevated white blood cell count, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and epigastric pain. MDS revealed that the resident had been discharged to a short-term general hospital. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 5, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Oct 18, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Sep 29, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Jul 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2019Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Mar 8, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Dec 9, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Dec 23, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Aug 3, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 6, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction