Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Church Point, Louisiana · CCN 195564
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 122
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 134
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Acadia
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 98 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Jun 9, 2026
153 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.53 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.12 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $268,528 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G48.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2350.0% | E1328.3% | F510.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6566×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5682×
Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 12, 2025
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (#105) of 39 sampled residents. S8CNA failed to obtain the appropriate number of persons required to utilize a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #105. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #105 on 09/13/2024 at approximately 6:35 AM when S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) moved the resident from a lying position to sitting position in preparation to transfer him into a chair without the assistance of a second person or a mechanical lifter as required by his plan of care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Dec 9, 2024
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for foot care and treatment for a diabetic resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF658Dec 9, 2024
Based on interviews, record review,and observation the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff identified skin changes timely for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Review of the resident's weekly skin evaluations 9/1/2024 through 11/18/2024 revealed the resident did not have any skin issues. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF687Dec 9, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received preventative foot care to avoid complications from the resident's medical condition such as diabetes and circulatory disorders. The facility failed to provide appropriate preventative foot care for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (#Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF576Feb 12, 2025
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received mail on Saturdays. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/27/2024 revealed she had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12, indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. A review of Resident #63's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 13, indicating her cognition was intact. A review of Resident #99's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 15, indicating her cognition was intact. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 122 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 11, 2026Standard9 findings
- Feb 12, 2025Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 9, 2024Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- May 29, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jan 11, 2024Standard12 findings
- Nov 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 29, 2023Complaint3 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Jun 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2022Standard9 findings
- Dec 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 4, 2021Standard10 findings
- Jan 23, 2020Standard3 findings
- Jan 17, 2019Standard2 findings
- Feb 1, 2018Standard7 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 7, 2016Standard6 findings
- Feb 13, 2015Standard5 findings
- Jan 16, 2014—7 findings
- Nov 27, 2013—3 findings
- Feb 22, 2013—8 findings
- Jan 26, 2012—4 findings
- Mar 18, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction