Deficiency Index

Abundant Christian Living Community Rehabilitation

Johnson City, Tennessee · CCN 445483

13 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
55
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
13
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy13

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
103
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Washington
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2024

853 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.163.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover42.4%48.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 55 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Abundant Christian Living Community Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 14, 2022

    Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of video footage, review of facility investigation, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 resident (#1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #1's family moved the resident from the facility out of fear of the psychosocial consequences from the facility's treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The findings included: Review of a facility policy Abuse Protocol revised date 8/2021 revealed .Verbal Abuse: the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jul 9, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for 1 resident (Resident #41) of 94 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Assignments, dated 4/2024, revealed .maintain a neat, clean .homelike environment . Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] Diabetes Mellitus, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Muscle Weakness. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Jul 9, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to follow the policy for restraint usage for 1 resident (Resident #65) of 5 residents reviewed for restraints. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restraints, dated 7/2023, revealed .It is the policy of this facility that restraints only be used for the safety and well-being of the Resident(s) .Before placing a Resident in a restraint, a pre-restraining assessment must be done to determine the need .a physician's order must be obtained indicating the specific reason, type, and medical reason for restraint . Medical record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension, and Muscle Weakness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Jun 14, 2022

    Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of video footage, review of facility investigation and interview the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment to prevent transmission of infection or disease for 1 resident (#1) of 5 sampled residents. The findings included: Review of the facility policy General Policies revised 1/2021 revealed .b. Maintain a sanitary environment for personnel, Residents, visitors, and the general public . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561Oct 6, 2021

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to honor the right to self-determination related to resident choices for food preferences for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 12 residents reviewed for choices. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Menu Substitutions and Alternatives, dated 2/14/2019, showed .Resident .who express a refusal of the food served are offered a substitute of similar nutritive value .Nursing Services offers the substitute in a timely manner when a resident refuses a menu item . Medical record review showed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 55 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 6, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jul 12, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
  • May 17, 2017Standard17 findings · 12 harm
  • May 18, 2016Standard1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Aug 19, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 7, 2014Standard5 findings
  • May 22, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 31, 2012Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • Sep 28, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction