Deficiency Index

Abernathy Laurels

Newton, North Carolina · CCN 345161

12 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
35
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
174
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
EVERYAGE SENIOR LIVING
County
Catawba
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 5, 2025

430 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.364.60
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.82—
Annual nurse turnover33.2%39.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 35 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Abernathy Laurels, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Jul 11, 2024

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to post cautionary safety signs that indicated the use of oxygen for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #79, #93, #136, #137 and #161). The findings included: 1) Resident #136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of shortness of breath. A review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 was cognitively intact with no behaviors and no rejections of care. Resident #136 was coded for oxygen therapy. Review of a physician's order dated 7/8/2024 revealed an order for Resident #136 was to have oxygen administered at 2 liters per minute via nasal canula continuously. An observation was conducted on 7/8/2024 at 12:02 pm. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565May 5, 2022

    Based on resident council meeting minutes, resident, and staff interview the facility failed to resolve dietary grievances that were reported in the resident council meeting for 8 out of 10 months (June 2021, July 2021, August 2021, September 2021, October 2021, December 2021, January 2022, and February 2022). a. Review of the 06/03/21 Resident Council (RC) minutes revealed the following dietary concern: the council commented on vegetables such as green beans and potatoes sometimes being undercooked. The response to the concern of vegetables such as green beans and potatoes being undercooked read in part: will address with staff in kitchen. The response was signed by the Administrator. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 5, 2022

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to label, date, and seal stored food items in 2 of 2 kitchens (main kitchen and satellite kitchen located on the first floor at the front of the facility). The facility also failed to discard stored foods after the manufacturer's expiration date in 2 of 2 kitchens (main kitchen and satellite kitchen). These practices had the potential to affect all residents who receive oral food nutrition. The findings included: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 5, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when a dependent rolled out of bed while care was being provided. She was sent to the hospital for evaluation and was identified with a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain's outer covering and the surface of the brain). She required no treatment at the hospital, was sent back to the facility the same day, did not experience pain as a result of the injury, and was not receiving a blood thinner. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jul 11, 2024

    Based on record review, staff interview, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident #32) code status election was accurate throughout the medical record for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for advanced directives. The findings included: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart disease. A review of a physician's order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was a full code. A review of a Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 wanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, chest compressions), limited scope of treatment which included to use medical treatment, intravenous (IV) fluids and cardiac monitoring as indicated, do not use intubation (breathing tube)… […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 35 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 5, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2024Standard2 findings
  • May 5, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jan 26, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Dec 2, 2016Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Oct 15, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Jul 25, 2013—6 findings
  • Jul 18, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 1, 2012Standard9 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 24, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction